 |

14-06-2008, 23:44
|
 |
Welling, England
PhotoTopix Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Buyer/Seller Classified Rating: 0% (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary Camera: Olympus,
Camera Skill: Beginner ,
Photoshop Skill: Intermediate,
Edit My Photos: Ask me first
|
|
My Main Interests:
Black & White
, Commercial
, Fashion
, Fine Art
, Landscape
, Location
, Portrait
, Event
, Studio
, Wedding
|

15-06-2008, 08:56
|
 |
My real name is: Steve
Merseyside, England
PhotoTopix Active Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Buyer/Seller Classified Rating: 0% (0)
|
|
|
It does look more natural than the first shot, for me the central placement of the light is what's off putting, moving it back towards a corner, as in the first shot, might be better.
|
|
Primary Camera: Canon,
Camera Skill: Intermediate ,
Photoshop Skill: Intermediate,
Edit My Photos: Ask me first
|
|
My Main Interests:
Architecture
, Landscape
, Macro
, Portrait
, Event
, Travel
|

15-06-2008, 12:59
|
 |
My real name is: Steve
Staffs, England
PhotoTopix Master
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Buyer/Seller Classified Rating: 0% (0)
|
|
|
Better than the first one Mate but am with you it's still not quite right???
Think what it is for me is that theres not actually a lot of light coming from such a bright source??? it's whited out it's that bright but a lot of the sky is pretty dark,and the two somehow don't go together???...   
__________________
Photography teaches that how well you see has nothing to do with how well you see.
|
|
Primary Camera: NIKON D300,Sigma 10mm-20mm,18mm-200mm,24mm-70mm 2.8,80mm-400mm,105mm macro,SB800.,
Camera Skill: Intermediate ,
Photoshop Skill: Intermediate,
Edit My Photos: Yes
|
|
My Main Interests:
Landscape
, Macro
, Nature
, Event
, Sport
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|



|
|