Go Back   PhotoTopix Photography Forum » Photo Talk » Cameras, Lenses and Accessories

Register

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 06:52 AM
YELLOWJACKET's Avatar
YELLOWJACKET YELLOWJACKET is offline
My real name is: PJ
 USA, Outside of the UK
PhotoTopix Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4 | My Gallery
Buyer/Seller Classified Rating: 0% (0)
View My Projects
Completed: 0 | Pending: 0
Default

Hey All, I Have A Nikon 105mm Vr For My D40x. It's The Best Thing Since Sliced Bread!!! I Didn't Want To Pay The Price But That Vr Is Well Worth It For Me. I'm Old And Getting Very Shakey. Without Vr I Must Use A Tripod All The Time, With Vr I Am Able To Hand Hold Most Of The Time. I Assume Vr On A Zoom Works As Well As On A Fixed Focual But What Do I Know. As To A Non-nikon Lens, I've Always Used Nikon Lenses And Been Happy With Them. Well, Except For The Price But Then I Can't Get Any Lens For What I Really Want To Pay. Another Thing To Consider In One Word - Used. Just My Two Cents Worth.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Primary Camera: Nikon, Camera Skill: Intermediate , Photoshop Skill: None, Edit My Photos: Yes
My Main Interests: Landscape , Location , Macro , Nature , Portrait , Studio
Sponsored Links
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 03:21 PM
TonyR TonyR is offline
My real name is: Tony
 North Yorkshire, England
PhotoTopix Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27 | My Gallery
Buyer/Seller Classified Rating: 0% (0)
View My Projects
Completed: 0 | Pending: 3
Default

Well after a lot of thoughts, I've gone for the Sigma APO 70-300. Hope its the right choice. Think I may invest in a fixed length telephoto at a later date aswell once i have a bit more knowledge and experience to see what i need.
Thanks for the advice.
Tony
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Primary Camera: Nikon, Camera Skill: Beginner , Photoshop Skill: Undisclosed, Edit My Photos: Ask me first
My Main Interests: Architecture , Black & White , Landscape , Night , Event , Travel
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-2008, 06:49 PM
Len's Avatar
Len Len is offline
My real name is: Len
 Teesside, England
PhotoTopix Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 826 | My Gallery
Buyer/Seller Classified Rating: 0% (0)
View My Projects
Completed: 1 | Pending: 3
Default

Hi All

I bought the 55-200 but now wish I'd up it a bit more but there you go.

I'll have to save the pennies.

Len
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Primary Camera: Nikon, Camera Skill: Beginner , Photoshop Skill: Beginner, Edit My Photos: Yes
My Main Interests: Animals , Food , Landscape , Macro , Nature , Portrait , Travel , Urban
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2008, 03:57 AM
barkeypf's Avatar
barkeypf barkeypf is offline
My real name is: Paul
 New York State USA, Outside of the UK
PhotoTopix Active Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 76 | My Gallery
Buyer/Seller Classified Rating: 0% (0)
View My Projects
Completed: 0 | Pending: 0
Default

I'm late to this post but i have a 70-300 VR Nikon. The vibration reduction works very well. As was stated earlier, if you are using a tripod you don't need VR. The times you do need VR you will be glad you spent the extra for it. Len, you can sell that 55-200 for a good price on Ebay after you saved some money. Then go for the VR.
__________________
Nikon D8o Nikkor 18-135 f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED Nikkor 70-300 f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED VR Hoya circular polarizer
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Primary Camera: Nikon, Camera Skill: Intermediate , Photoshop Skill: Intermediate, Edit My Photos: Yes
My Main Interests: Architecture , Cityscape , Landscape , Macro , Nature , Night , Travel
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 26-04-2008, 04:25 PM
Manicminer Manicminer is offline
My real name is: Meirion
 North, Wales
PhotoTopix Active Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 54 | My Gallery
Buyer/Seller Classified Rating: 0% (0)
View My Projects
Completed: 0 | Pending: 1
Default

I have just bought a Sigma 18-200mm 1:3.5-6.3 HSM with optical stabilizer for my D40X today.

The test will come at dusk when I shall zoom in at a distant subject with no tripod.....

The camera weighs twice as much now
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Primary Camera: Nikon, Camera Skill: Beginner , Photoshop Skill: None, Edit My Photos: Yes
My Main Interests: Industrial , Landscape , Location , Nature , Night , Panoramic , Travel
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 26-04-2008, 06:14 PM
Ogofmole's Avatar
Ogofmole Ogofmole is offline
My real name is: Barry
 Near Brecon, Wales
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,784 | My Gallery
Buyer/Seller Classified Rating: 0% (0)
View My Projects
Completed: 7 | Pending: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manicminer View Post
I have just bought a Sigma 18-200mm 1:3.5-6.3 HSM with optical stabilizer for my D40X today.

The test will come at dusk when I shall zoom in at a distant subject with no tripod.....

The camera weighs twice as much now
We will look forward to hearing how you got on.
__________________
Nikon User
Beacon Images - last updated 29th June
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Primary Camera: Nikon, Camera Skill: Intermediate , Photoshop Skill: Intermediate, Edit My Photos: Yes
My Main Interests: Black & White , Infrared , Landscape , Macro
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 26-04-2008, 09:33 PM
Manicminer Manicminer is offline
My real name is: Meirion
 North, Wales
PhotoTopix Active Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 54 | My Gallery
Buyer/Seller Classified Rating: 0% (0)
View My Projects
Completed: 0 | Pending: 1
Default

After a very short test I will say the following.
Under normal circumstances you can zoom in with the optical stabilizer on and capture an image that you might otherwise miss if you had to set up a tripod. It seems to be good if you were to take photos of sport or wildlife. It's usable in failing light up to a point, beyond that you need a tripod.
You can't beat a tripod if you have the time to set one up.
It's another tool to have in your bag, good to have if you need it, but not essential.

The lens is quiet with the OS off, a little noisy and jumpy with it on.
After using the kit lens I find that I tend to move the focus ring unintentionally. It can't be doing it any good when it's in AF.

I reserve the right to change my mind as I get used to it

Last edited by Manicminer : 26-04-2008 at 09:38 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Primary Camera: Nikon, Camera Skill: Beginner , Photoshop Skill: None, Edit My Photos: Yes
My Main Interests: Industrial , Landscape , Location , Nature , Night , Panoramic , Travel
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Our Sponsors


Click here to contact us and request details on our advertising options pack.

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:39 PM. | ©2008 PhotoTopix

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0