 |

29-03-2008, 04:15 PM
|
 |
My real name is: Lisa
Suffolk, England
PhotoTopix Contributor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Buyer/Seller Rating: 0% (0)
|
|
|
Nikon D40 plus Tamron zoom lens
decided on the 55-200mm f/4-5.6 Di ll LD as it has a Macro facility. I'm pretty pleased with the zoom (as much as I can be when I cant get out!!) but cant seem to have any success with macro shots. I'm 90% sure it's something I must be doing or not doing but cant work out what! Any ideas or have I made a big mistake in going for a more budget lens to do 2 jobs instead of investing in a more specialised one?
|
|
Primary Camera: Nikon,
Camera Skill: Beginner ,
Photoshop Skill: Beginner,
Edit My Photos: Yes
|
|
My Main Interests:
Animals
, Nature
|

29-03-2008, 04:45 PM
|
 |
My real name is: Barry
Near Brecon, Wales
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Buyer/Seller Rating: 0% (0)
|
|
|
In what way are you not having any success with macro.
__________________
Nikon User
Beacon Images - last updated 29th June
|
|
Primary Camera: Nikon,
Camera Skill: Intermediate ,
Photoshop Skill: Intermediate,
Edit My Photos: Yes
|
|
My Main Interests:
Black & White
, Infrared
, Landscape
, Macro
|

29-03-2008, 04:53 PM
|
 |
My real name is: Barry
Near Brecon, Wales
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Buyer/Seller Rating: 0% (0)
|
|
|
__________________
Nikon User
Beacon Images - last updated 29th June
|
|
Primary Camera: Nikon,
Camera Skill: Intermediate ,
Photoshop Skill: Intermediate,
Edit My Photos: Yes
|
|
My Main Interests:
Black & White
, Infrared
, Landscape
, Macro
|

29-03-2008, 05:03 PM
|
 |
My real name is: Steve
Staffs, England
PhotoTopix Master
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Buyer/Seller Rating: 0% (0)
|
|
|
EY UP Lisa,
as Baz say's depends what sort of problem your having???
I used to have the Tamron 70-300 with macro on it..with it being a zoom i suspect it will only be 1:2 which means it will only reproduce half life size a true macro is 1:1 which is lifesize.
Also it will have a set range for the macro the 70-300 was from about 190mm i seem to remember which means you have to be at least 1.9 metres away from your subject,and obviously would not focus past 3 metres (300mm).
Hope this helps if not give us a shout...
Mello.
|
|
Primary Camera: NIKON D300,Sigma 10mm-20mm,18mm-200mm,24mm-70mm 2.8,80mm-400mm,105mm macro,SB800.,
Camera Skill: Intermediate ,
Photoshop Skill: Intermediate,
Edit My Photos: Yes
|
|
My Main Interests:
Landscape
, Macro
, Nature
, Event
, Sport
|

29-03-2008, 05:57 PM
|
 |
My real name is: Lisa
Suffolk, England
PhotoTopix Contributor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Buyer/Seller Rating: 0% (0)
|
|
|
i'm probably too close then. it just doesn't seem to focus close-up. it did have a good review in "digital photo" magazine this month so that's why i'm fairly sure it's me not the lens. just used to being right on top (pardon the expression!) of the subject with the compact.
|
|
Primary Camera: Nikon,
Camera Skill: Beginner ,
Photoshop Skill: Beginner,
Edit My Photos: Yes
|
|
My Main Interests:
Animals
, Nature
|

29-03-2008, 07:10 PM
|
 |
My real name is: Steve
Staffs, England
PhotoTopix Master
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Buyer/Seller Rating: 0% (0)
|
|
|
Last edited by Mello : 29-03-2008 at 07:19 PM.
|
|
Primary Camera: NIKON D300,Sigma 10mm-20mm,18mm-200mm,24mm-70mm 2.8,80mm-400mm,105mm macro,SB800.,
Camera Skill: Intermediate ,
Photoshop Skill: Intermediate,
Edit My Photos: Yes
|
|
My Main Interests:
Landscape
, Macro
, Nature
, Event
, Sport
|

29-03-2008, 07:39 PM
|
 |
Cardiff, England
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Buyer/Seller Rating: 0% (0)
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lisa1970
decided on the 55-200mm f/4-5.6 Di ll LD as it has a Macro facility. I'm pretty pleased with the zoom (as much as I can be when I cant get out!!) but cant seem to have any success with macro shots. I'm 90% sure it's something I must be doing or not doing but cant work out what! Any ideas or have I made a big mistake in going for a more budget lens to do 2 jobs instead of investing in a more specialised one?
|
Hi lisa did you buy the lens thinking you would get very close macros ?
alot of the so called macro lenses are not true 1x macros so you cannot get amazingly close and will not get the very large close ups that you would get with a 100mm or a 180mm, your focal distance needs to match your lens as the last post states, if you want to get in closer you could add close up filters that will help!
|
|
Primary Camera: Canon,
Camera Skill: Advanced ,
Photoshop Skill: Advanced,
Edit My Photos: Ask me first
|
|
My Main Interests:
Animals
, Concert
, Fine Art
, Landscape
, Macro
, Nature
, Night
, Panoramic
, Portrait
, Studio
|

29-03-2008, 08:07 PM
|
 |
My real name is: Lisa
Suffolk, England
PhotoTopix Contributor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Buyer/Seller Rating: 0% (0)
|
|
|
i think i was trying to kill 2 birds with 1 stone so to speak but now i see i'll only get about 1/3 of a "true" macro. the zoom was the most important part for me but i do use the macro function on rainy days for flower shots. guess i'll have a period of trial and error before i decide if i'll want a dedicated macro lens. i have a close-up filter that i had for an old kodak that fits the nikon kit lens, i'll see if it fits this 
|
|
Primary Camera: Nikon,
Camera Skill: Beginner ,
Photoshop Skill: Beginner,
Edit My Photos: Yes
|
|
My Main Interests:
Animals
, Nature
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Our Sponsors

| |